|
|
TIME Magazine
Big Brother Inc.
The biometric technologies now tracking
our borders may soon pop up in some cool consumer gadgets
March 29, 2004
By Elaine Shannon
WASHINGTON—Guy
Scott nips into his cubby-hole lab in a far corner of
Cross Match Technologies' headquarters — a reclaimed
ice-skating rink in Palm Beach Gardens, Fla.--and
proudly displays a postage-stamp-size bit of translucent
gray film that looks like debris from a darkroom floor.
It is the heart of a new machine that he says will
revolutionize the global financial system, bring the
multibillion identity-theft racket to a halt and make
teenagers behave in cars.
The New Zealand — born engineer
isn't known as the Mad Kiwi for nothing. But his colleagues
and financial backers believe in him. Cross Match, a
privately held company, plans to put Scott's device, called
the Authorizer, into production sometime this fall, charging
$10 or so a copy. The gray film, a piece of plastic-coated
acoustic ceramic one-ten-thousandth of an inch thick, is for
Authorizer's touch pad, to be embedded in a cell phone. To
make a credit-card transaction, say, a buyer presses his
finger to the touch pad, triggering an imperceptible pulse
of energy that makes the film oscillate. The resulting
ultrasound image is captured as a digital image file called
a biometric identifier, which is a physical feature that has
been measured and converted into computer language so it can
be compared against a database. If his print matches, the
credit-card charge goes through.
The Authorizer is among the first
consumer gadgets to evolve from the biometrics industry,
which, after years of promise, is on the verge of rapid
growth as government-mandated security plans become
operational. With the threat of terrorism now a long-term
concern, biometric-identification systems are blossoming
around the world. To stop bad guys at the border, for
instance, the U.S. is embarking on a program called
U.S.-VISIT, for U.S. Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator
Technology, which was mandated by Congress in 2002.
Biometric technologies are the linchpins of the new system,
expected to cost $10 billion over the next decade. The
technology is not just to keep track of foreign visitors
either. If you're leaving the country, get ready to be face
printed. The U.S. State Department is retooling its passport
production process and by the end of next year will issue
new passports with an embedded chip containing a facial
biometric and biographical data. This will enable the
government to boost security without resorting to passport
fingerprinting, which could incite fears of Big Brother.
With more and more applications
coming online, the biometrics industry's global revenues,
$719 million in 2003, should hit $4.6 billion by 2008,
according to the International Biometric Group in New York
City. "The U.S.-VISIT program is by far the most
important national-security program in the world right
now," says security-technology analyst Prianka Chopra
of Frost & Sullivan, a New York City market-consulting
firm. "Every country is looking to the U.S. to see what
the program is doing and what technologies will be
used." Chopra expects the global biometrics industry to
grow at a compounded annual rate of 35%.
Some of that will come from
agencies such as U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP),
which recently began fingerprinting all visitors arriving at
airports and seaports and traveling on visas —
essentially, citizens of developing countries. CBP chose
Cross Match fingerprint scanners for deployment at its
checkpoints in 115 U.S. airports and 14 seaports, in a
contract initially worth just $1.8 million.
Much bigger deals are in the
works, and the competition will be fierce. Among the leading
contenders: Lockheed Martin, Accenture and Computer Sciences
Corp. By Dec. 31, CBP is required by law to fingerprint all
visitors with visas at the 50 busiest land crossings along
the Canadian and Mexican borders. The remaining 100 or so
land-crossing points must be covered by the end of 2005.
This year the State Department's 211 consular offices must
be able to fingerprint all visa applicants and embed all
U.S. visas with a bar code containing the traveler's
digitized print, photo and biographical information.
Facial-recognition biometric
technology will also come into the mix this year. From Oct.
26, visitors from the 27 so-called visa-waiver nations —
most of Europe, plus Australia, Japan, Singapore and Brunei
— will be required to present passports embedded with
machine-readable bar codes containing a facial biometric,
which a computer will compare with a digital photo taken
upon entry. Some foreign governments have already made the
transition. Italy has rolled out an identity card with a
fingerprint and facial biometric. A number of countries,
notably Saudi Arabia, are looking at biometrics for
national-identity cards and border control. Britain's
passport service is testing a facial-recognition and
fingerprint-biometric program.
As other federal and local
agencies and private corporations scale up, the field will
be forced to do the same. The industry, which currently
consists of a couple of hundred biometrics companies, will
eventually consolidate into a handful, says Brian Ruttenbur,
an equity research analyst for Morgan Keegan & Co., an
investment firm based in Memphis, Tenn. "There's been a
gold-rush mentality for years in the biometric space. The
problem is, nobody's really found the gold yet." Three
biometrics companies merged to form Identix, based in
Minneapolis, Minn., which with $92 million in revenues is
considered the world's leading biometric-security company.
It is Cross Match's only U.S. rival for sales of the
high-resolution, forensic-quality live-scan machines, which
capture fingerprints with inkless optical-scanning
technology and transmit them to central databases. While
Identix's scanners are bigger and pricier than most of the
smaller company's comparable products, the two firms compete
directly for deals that require machines for a desktop or
larger. Earlier this month Identix further expanded,
acquiring DeLean Vision Worldwide, a developer of
skin-texture biometrics.
Government contracts, as
they have in the past, could promote consumer product
development too, especially as people get more
comfortable with the technology. And that means making
them foolproof and fiendproof. Cross Match's fingerprint
Authorizer, for instance, has inspired its designers to
anticipate an underworld market in Authorizer-equipped
cell phones being operated with lopped-off fingers.
"No system would fly if part of your anatomy is
threatened and is necessary to secure what could be
substantial assets," says Scott. So the sensor in
the phone doesn't merely read a static fingerprint. It
also looks for proof of life — blood flow, tissue
elasticity and capillary structure. It also uses an
anxiety index being developed by the University of
Michigan medical school to measure stress-induced,
minute changes in capillaries and sweat glands. "If
someone puts a gun to your head, the transaction won't
occur, and people will not bother to put guns to
people's heads because they won't get paid for it,"
says Scott.
Eventually, he believes, pocket
biometric devices will replace credit and ATM cards and will
even dispense with notaries public and those time-consuming
face-to-face real-estate closings. Personal and biometric
data, says Scott, would be transmitted via cell phone to a
cybervault maintained by a financial-service company. If its
computer decided everything was in order, the transaction
would go through. Certainly the privacy issue will rear its
head again, but, as has happened with Internet transactions,
if consumers are confident in the system and it offers
convenience, those fears won't be fatal to growth.
On a more down-to-earth level, the
Authorizer is being considered as an optional feature by at
least one car manufacturer, according to Cross Match
officials. Besides thwarting thieves, it could be programmed
to prevent your 17-year-old from going faster than, say, 55
m.p.h. by activating a speed limiter and to play dead if
your 14-year-old had the bright idea to get behind the
wheel.
The notion of a cashless economy
facilitated by databanks of digitized body parts is still
kind of far out. But then, so are most things about Cross
Match. The company was founded in 1996 by Scott, a medical
ultrasound specialist, and two fellow engineers turned
garage inventors, Jim Davis, who worked on the engine of the
SR-71 Blackbird at Lockheed, and Ellis Betensky, who
improved Vivitar zoom lenses and pioneered computer-aided
design for cameras.
At the time, the FBI's Criminal
Justice Information System (CJIS) facility in Clarksburg,
W.Va., was scanning its vast collection of ink-and-paper
fingerprint cards into a digital database that could be
searched by computer. The Cross Match founders spotted an
empty niche for light, rugged, relatively inexpensive
live-scan fingerprint machines. Borrowing $250,000 from
relatives and friends, they came up with a 23-lb., $10,000
optical scanner that produced high-resolution,
forensic-quality print images. It could fit in a backpack,
and its calibration was not thrown off by jarring from a
squad car or humvee. In 1997 the three partners brought in
Ted Johnson, a retired Paine Webber executive, to be CEO and
chief fund raiser. "They really took the industry by
storm," says Brian Gesuale, vice president for
technology research at Piper Jaffray, an investment-banking
firm based in Minneapolis, Minn.
By 2002 Cross Match reported
revenues of $25 million. It now employs 165 people to make
print scanners of different sizes. Even Martha Stewart
noticed. "It's a new machine," she told Barbara
Walters in November. "You don't have to get that ink
all over your fingers."
After 9/11, the FBI and the
military snapped up Cross Match scanners for deployment in
Afghanistan and at Guantanamo Bay to fingerprint al-Qaeda
and Taliban fighters. Those prints, along with thousands of
unidentified ones lifted from uncovered safe houses around
the globe and from arrests made by allies, were fed into a
classified terrorist-fingerprint database at the FBI's West
Virginia fingerprinting facility. Cross Match scanners were
sent to Iraq to book captured terrorists, insurgents and
Saddam Hussein. (Saddam was annoyed, according to agents
posted to Iraq. "This is how you treat criminals!"
he is said to have protested between printing and mug shots.
"That's right," an agent replied. "Now turn
sideways.")
The FBI wants to use
biometrics to fight the problem of anonymity among the
men detained by the U.S. military. "The biometrics
piece is critical," says Ed Worthington, recently
the FBI's commander in Baghdad. "If they do try to
come into this country at some point, we'll know
instantaneously, and we'll be able to tell that the guy
was detained for anticoalition activities. That's
huge." FBI officials tell TIME that some insurgents
have turned up with ordinary criminal records dating
from their days as students or visitors. "That's
good interrogation material, particularly if they claim
they've never been in the States," says FBI
assistant director Mike Kirkpatrick, head of the CJIS
complex.
Identix is on the cutting edge of
the field of facial-recognition software, a technology that
will play an important role in biometric photos to be
embedded in U.S. passports and those of other industrialized
nations over the next few years. Mexico is using the
technology in national elections. Colorado vets driver's
license applicants using similar software made by Digimarc
ID Systems.
Identix CEO Joseph Atick, a
physicist who pioneered facial recognition in academia and
then co-founded Visionics, which merged in 2002 with Identix,
says the company's trademark software, FaceIt, is about to
come out with a dramatic upgrade. Besides mapping the
topography of the face, Atick says, the next-generation
software will add a new dimension, skin texture, that will
make the results far more accurate. "The canvas of the
human skin is as unique as a fingerprint," he says. The
software will map sectors of skin, noting the size and
position of tiny features like pores. The result, he says,
will produce an identification certainty that will be used
to authenticate financial transactions in the global
economy. In other words, it will be possible to know whether
yours is a face that can be trusted.
|