|
The Guardian
Biometrics-great hope for world security or triumph for
Big Brother?
June 18, 2004
By Owen
Bowcott
British police will almost certainly be given access in the
near future to US intelligence databases containing DNA
samples, fingerprints and digital images of thousands of
foreign nationals seized around the world by the US as
terror suspects.
As the war on terror increasingly comes to rely on
biometric technology - the use of physical characteristics
unique to individuals such as iris pattern, DNA and
fingerprints to verify identify - western police and
intelligence agencies are drawing up plans for sophisticated
biometric databases which would allow them to share
sensitive information.
"The only way to trace a terrorist is through
biometrics," Mike Kirkpatrick, assistant director of
the FBI's criminal justice services division, told a
conference for European firms selling biometric security
measures yesterday. "[Traditional] passports are pretty
damn meaningless."
The FBI, which has more than 75m fingerprints on its
criminal and civil computer records, is adding biometric
details from suspects detained in Iraq, Afghanistan and
elsewhere.
"We are obtaining DNA from terrorists around the
world as we encounter them," Mr Kirkpatrick said.
"We have set up a terrorist screening centre. In Iraq,
the high value detainees are having DNA samples,
fingerprints and digital photographs taken. The numbers
involved are in the thousands. We are doing it wherever it's
appropriate, wherever there's a threat to the USA."
Canada, he told the conference in Morgantown, West
Virginia, had already been given direct electronic access to
such FBI databases. "We are having discussions with the
UK, through Pito [the Police Information Technology
Organisation], about whether they should have [direct]
access to our systems ... I would hope mutual exchanges [of
information online] will happen in the next few years. It's
in everyone's interest that we have a good sharing
mechanism."
Already, the first practical results of coordinated
database programmes and reinforced border controls are
coming on stream. They all rely heavily on biometric
components. In Britain, the passport agency has begun trials
to examine what type of biometric details the next
generation of travel documents will contain.
The immigration service is already fingerprinting visa
applicants in Sri Lanka and east Africa as well as asylum
seekers who arrive in the UK. The fingerprints are checked
against a computer database called Eurodac - based in
Luxembourg and developed by a British company, Steria Ltd -
to see if there have been previous applications for asylum
in any other EU country. If so, the asylum seeker may be
deported.
The main UK police computer storing fingerprints, called
Nafis, is also due to be replaced soon by a system codenamed
Ident1. Two US firms, Lockheed Martin and Northrup Gruman,
are bidding for the contract that is likely to be decided
this autumn. The new system will record finger and palm
prints and also provide a platform for other biometric
measures.
Last night, civil liberties campaigners voiced
concerns about governments sharing biometric data
through international databases. "There is now a
total obsession with this technology as a way of
combatting anything and everything and it's a
fallacy," said Barry Hugill of Liberty. "Once
you begin to compile massive databases it's a matter of
common sense that you are going to get the most
horrendous mix-ups, with the wrong people being accused
and the the wrong information being shared around the
world."
British law enforcement and intelligence agencies
believe that access to the US databases will streamline
international cooperation between police forces and make
it much harder for terror suspects known to one country
to enter another. The data would be used mainly to vet
people travelling to the UK, either at the point where
they apply for visas or when they reach a British
airport or port.
Ian Brown, director of the Foundation for Information
Policy Research said: "British police are very much
moving towards a model in which they obtain as much
data, biometric or otherwise, on individuals and share
it as widely as possible. The danger is that information
about British citizens will be shared with the Americans
and there are very few safeguards on how this can be
used by the US authorities who have a very different
idea to privacy and data protection from us."
But the enthusiasm for biometric security systems as
a means of foiling future terrorist atrocities -
bolstered by demands for tighter controls over illegal
immigration - is stimulating a boom in technology firms
that specialise in screening large numbers of people and
verifying individual identities.
The global market in biometric products is expected
to swell from being worth around $1bn now to more than
$4.5bn in four years, according to Raj Nanavati of the
International Biometric Group.
The industry has not yet devised sufficiently
reliable solutions to satisfy the expectations raised,
post-9/11, in Washington, London and Brussels. But a
cluster of federal agencies and academic expertise in
West Virginia is creating a focus for such pioneering
businesses.
The state, which is home to the FBI's fingerprint
database and US defence department (DoD) biometrics
research laboratories, is also drawing in British firms
and security experts. Officers from Pito liaise closely
with the FBI and a former member of British
intelligence-gathering community is on the board of the
National Biometric Security Project in Morgantown. A
British embassy trade official monitored this week's
conference.
Inter-communicating databases are increasingly being
seen as the essential next step as law enforcement
agencies work out how to handle the biometric data they
are gathering. "We are now having systems put in
place which can cross check," Dr Michael Yura, the
head of the National Biometric Security Project.
Sam Cava, director of the DoD's Biometrics Fusion
Centre, also in Clarksburg, West Virginia, deplored the
segregation of personal records. "It doesn't do to
have 50 systems that don't cooperate," he said.
For visitors to the United States, the most visible
change is the US-Visit security programme which will
require foreign visitors to have their two index finger
prints recorded on an electronic scanner and a digital
photograph taken.
The department of homeland security, which operates
the system, claims that since its inception 500 people
on the FBI's wanted lists have been detained. It is not
clear how many were detected by having their
fingerprints or pictures taken.
"The US Visit programme wants to tap in to
databases on foreign soil," said Dr Edwin Rood,
director of the Biometric Knowledge Centre at West
Virginia University in Morgantown.
The first line of defence for the US will be
consulates abroad where visa applicants will be
subjected to biometric tests. The contract for US-Visit
has temporarily been suspended following a row in
Congress over the fact that the company heading the
consortium, Accenture, is based in the tax haven of
Bermuda. The value of the contract over 10 years has
been estimated at $10bn (£5.9bn).
A similar border control system to US-Visit is being
contemplated by the EU. Nicknamed Schengen Two, it was
the main subject of debate at an EU summit in Dublin
this week. It is expected to incorporate biometric
measurements in new passports which would have an
embedded computer chip.
Eyes have it
· Californian biometric company IriTech Inc
offers an iris-scanning programme to detect drug use. By
analysing the pupil's reaction to a flash of light, the
programme claims, it can "track the acute
irregularities of the nervous system". Used by
probation services to monitor the presence of drugs in
the body.
· 3D facial recognition is being championed
as a means of overcoming the problems experienced by
computer analysis of faces. Recognition Sciences claims
it can assemble a three-dimensional image of a suspect
given just two photographs from different angles.
"It can match a million images a second,"
claims Jim O'Malley, its president. "It's ideal for
tracking terrorist suspects and matching them to a watch
list." Other researchers are investigating the
possibility of producing a secure 3D image for a
passport, taken by a camera rotating 360 degrees around
each applicant.
· Fears that al-Qaida may assemble a lorry
bomb in the US have stimulated investigation into the
possibility of monitoring lorry drivers carrying heavy
or hazardous loads. A palm scanner could be embedded
into a gear stick so approved drivers could be regularly
assured.
· In Britain, a company called Unilink is
putting fingerprint scanning systems into an immigration
detention centre near Heathrow to control visits.
· Both the UK and US are introducing frequent
flyer programmes which will allow participants to bypass
check-in delays by registering their biometric details.
|