|
|
Computerworld
Tech Check: Tuning Key to Voice
Systems
November 10, 2003
By Kym Gilhooly
NOVEMBER 10, 2003 ( COMPUTERWORLD
) - A big issue for businesses implementing voice
authentication applications is how to tune the system to
reduce errors known as false acceptances and false
rejections. False acceptance occurs when an imposter gains
access to a system; false rejection occurs when an authentic
user doesn't. The frequency of these errors is measured
using metrics known as false acceptance rates (FAR) and
false rejection rates (FRR).
A voice authentication system
plots the interplay of the two error rates against each
other to establish an access threshold. If the threshold is
changed to lower one error rate, the other one automatically
goes up. To make a system effective, companies must strike a
balance between the two, depending on the intent of their
voice applications.
"With applications, it really
does depend on the intent of speaker verification,"
says Kevin Farrell, director of speaker verification at
ScanSoft. "If it's there as a customer-oriented
convenience, and helps with costs in the call center, you
might use a lower threshold, whereas you'd use a higher
threshold for financial transactions."
But by themselves, FAR and FRR
don't mean much, says Samir Nanavati, a partner at
International Biometric Group. What matters, he says, is the
combination of those with a third metric, the enrollment
rate. "It doesn't matter what your FAR and FRR rates
are if you fail to enroll 14% of your user population,"
he says.
What organizations should be
looking at, says Nanavati, is a system's ability to verify.
"From a business perspective, especially in the private
sector, companies really don't care why you couldn't use a
system. They primarily care that they have 12 million
customers, and whether a system can handle that."
|