It has long been held that most biometric systems are capable of detecting
liveness in biometric samples. Liveness detection in a biometric system ensures
that only "real" fingerprints, facial images, irises, and other
characteristics are capable of generating templates for enrollment,
verification, and identification. From a security and accountability
perspective, requiring a live biometric characteristic makes it difficult for an
individual to repudiate that he or she executed a transaction, accessed a secure
facility, or applied for a benefit.
Recent academic and media tests, however, show that with negligible-to-modest effort many leading biometric systems are susceptible to attacks
in which fake fingerprints, static facial images, and static iris images can be used
successfully as biometric samples. These fraudulent samples are processed by the
biometric system to generate templates and to verify enrolled individuals.
Methods of attack include fashioning fingerprints from gelatin, superimposing iris images atop human eyes,
even breathing on a fingerprint sensor. In the words of C'T magazine, responsible for executing a handful of these successful attacks: "...the products in the versions made available to us were more of the nature of toys than of serious security measures."
The implications of this demonstrable susceptibility to
"spoofing" - defeating a biometric system through fake biometric
samples - are as follows.
International Biometric Group
In
addition to our accuracy- and enrollment-focused Comparative
Biometric Testing, International Biometric Group performs custom Vulnerability
and Penetration Testing of biometric devices and systems. IBG evaluates
resistance to spoof attacks, replay attacks, communication attacks, and other
attempts to defeat or circumvent biometric systems.